Comments on: E-Mail Retention & Sarbanes-Oxley White Paper http://www.edgeblog.net/2006/e-mail-retention-sarbanes-oxley-white-paper/ Notes from the edge Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:14:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: edgeblog » Supreme Court Releases New E-Discovery Rules http://www.edgeblog.net/2006/e-mail-retention-sarbanes-oxley-white-paper/#comment-91 edgeblog » Supreme Court Releases New E-Discovery Rules Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:35:55 +0000 http://www.edgebacklabs.net/2006/8/#comment-91 [...] In case you missed the news, today new Supreme Court rules went into effect regarding e-discovery. There were several good articles on the wires today: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20061202/tc_cmp/195900034" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Yahoo</a>; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/01/AR2006120100567.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Washington Post</a>; <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ibd/061201/general.html?.v=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Investor’s Business Daily</a>. The problem with all these articles is that they don’t provide links to the actual rules published by the court. Since I have no life, I searched the Supreme Court’s website for the published rules. The new rules (<a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/frcv06p.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/frcv06p.pdf</a>) were released by the Supremes last April. Based on my reading, there is both good and bad news in the rules with regards to e-discovery[...] [...] In case you missed the news, today new Supreme Court rules went into effect regarding e-discovery. There were several good articles on the wires today: Yahoo; Washington Post; Investor’s Business Daily. The problem with all these articles is that they don’t provide links to the actual rules published by the court. Since I have no life, I searched the Supreme Court’s website for the published rules. The new rules (http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/frcv06p.pdf) were released by the Supremes last April. Based on my reading, there is both good and bad news in the rules with regards to e-discovery[...]

]]> By: bill http://www.edgeblog.net/2006/e-mail-retention-sarbanes-oxley-white-paper/#comment-18 bill Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:50:07 +0000 http://www.edgebacklabs.net/2006/8/#comment-18 What version of Acrobat are you using? The file should open fine with the current reader. It is pasword protected against modification, so it may cause problems for 3rd party readers. -Bill What version of Acrobat are you using? The file should open fine with the current reader. It is pasword protected against modification, so it may cause problems for 3rd party readers.

-Bill

]]> By: Bayly http://www.edgeblog.net/2006/e-mail-retention-sarbanes-oxley-white-paper/#comment-17 Bayly Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:42:01 +0000 http://www.edgebacklabs.net/2006/8/#comment-17 I tried to dowload this PDF, but I get an error message - "Bad encrypt dictionary" ? I tried to dowload this PDF, but I get an error message - “Bad encrypt dictionary” ?

]]>