<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Search of Five 9s - Calculating Availability of Complex Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/</link>
	<description>Notes from the edge</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hisham Ghanem</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/comment-page-1/#comment-67268</link>
		<dc:creator>Hisham Ghanem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/#comment-67268</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Great article and formulas posed through the site:
http://www.availabilitydigest.com./public_articles/
article "Calculating Availability - Redundant Systems".
I notived though that the "Multiple Nodes, Multiple Spares" formula has an issue with the (-1)!, when #of nodes = # of spares.

Did I miss a point when reading the article?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Great article and formulas posed through the site:<br />
<a href="http://www.availabilitydigest.com./public_articles/" rel="nofollow">http://www.availabilitydigest.com./public_articles/</a><br />
article &#8220;Calculating Availability - Redundant Systems&#8221;.<br />
I notived though that the &#8220;Multiple Nodes, Multiple Spares&#8221; formula has an issue with the (-1)!, when #of nodes = # of spares.</p>
<p>Did I miss a point when reading the article?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Loosley</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/comment-page-1/#comment-27583</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Loosley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/#comment-27583</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bill,&lt;br /&gt;
Nice analysis! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I responded to your comment on my blog http://www.webperformancematters.com/performance-forum/post/296647 listing some of my own posts on this topic. My analysis was at a much higher level than yours, more like an introduction to the concepts you are working with in your formulas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--Chris&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
Nice analysis! </p>
<p>I responded to your comment on my blog <a href="http://www.webperformancematters.com/performance-forum/post/296647" rel="nofollow">http://www.webperformancematters.com/performance-forum/post/296647</a> listing some of my own posts on this topic. My analysis was at a much higher level than yours, more like an introduction to the concepts you are working with in your formulas.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/comment-page-1/#comment-27568</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/#comment-27568</guid>
		<description>Mr. Highleyman,

Great tip! For anyone who liked my article, but wants to see the math expressed more eloquently, go immediately to this site and read: http://www.availabilitydigest.com./public_articles/0101/calculating_availability.pdf

The basic calculations are the same, but his equations are much better than mine.

-Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Highleyman,</p>
<p>Great tip! For anyone who liked my article, but wants to see the math expressed more eloquently, go immediately to this site and read: <a href="http://www.availabilitydigest.com./public_articles/0101/calculating_availability.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.availabilitydigest.com./public_articles/0101/calculating_availability.pdf</a></p>
<p>The basic calculations are the same, but his equations are much better than mine.</p>
<p>-Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Highleyman</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/comment-page-1/#comment-27553</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Highleyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/2007/in-search-of-five-9s/#comment-27553</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed your article on five 9s. High availability is a field that I specialize in. You might want to check out the Availability Digest, a free monthly digest of high availability issues, at www.availabilitydigest.com. Go to the Article Archives and look under The Geek Corner. There you will find a series of papers on calculating availabity using effectively the same equations you use, though in a different form.

- Bill Highleyman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed your article on five 9s. High availability is a field that I specialize in. You might want to check out the Availability Digest, a free monthly digest of high availability issues, at <a href="http://www.availabilitydigest.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.availabilitydigest.com</a>. Go to the Article Archives and look under The Geek Corner. There you will find a series of papers on calculating availabity using effectively the same equations you use, though in a different form.</p>
<p>- Bill Highleyman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.269 seconds -->
