<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Cuts Do Not Cause Deficits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edgeblog.net/2008/tax-cuts-do-not-cause-deficits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2008/tax-cuts-do-not-cause-deficits/</link>
	<description>Notes from the edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:17:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 5 Myths of Modern Liberals (and Why I&#8217;ll Never Become One) &#124; edgeblog</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2008/tax-cuts-do-not-cause-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-112909</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Myths of Modern Liberals (and Why I&#8217;ll Never Become One) &#124; edgeblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/?p=154#comment-112909</guid>
		<description>[...] Truth &#8211; As I wrote last year, spending and not tax cuts cause deficits. &#8220;There is no causal relationship between [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Truth &#8211; As I wrote last year, spending and not tax cuts cause deficits. &#8220;There is no causal relationship between [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicans and Taxes - Politics and Other Controversies - Page 2 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2008/tax-cuts-do-not-cause-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-106080</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicans and Taxes - Politics and Other Controversies - Page 2 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/?p=154#comment-106080</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVE</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2008/tax-cuts-do-not-cause-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-96240</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/?p=154#comment-96240</guid>
		<description>Spending went up during the Clinton years, but there was economic expansion. Yes, tax increases does bring down the deficits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spending went up during the Clinton years, but there was economic expansion. Yes, tax increases does bring down the deficits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2008/tax-cuts-do-not-cause-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-86494</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/?p=154#comment-86494</guid>
		<description>Me,

1st, one point of the Laffer model is it is impossible to know where you are on the curve. You would have said the same thing before the capital gains tax cuts, but you would have been wrong.

Cutting taxes is not the same thing as throwing cash at corporations. Tax cuts allow those who earned the money to keep it. 

Bush and the Republicans who increased spending after 2001 were anything but conservative! That is part of the problem. McCain is also far from conservative, but he is better than Barry. Thanks for reading and commenting. Next time leave your real name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me,</p>
<p>1st, one point of the Laffer model is it is impossible to know where you are on the curve. You would have said the same thing before the capital gains tax cuts, but you would have been wrong.</p>
<p>Cutting taxes is not the same thing as throwing cash at corporations. Tax cuts allow those who earned the money to keep it. </p>
<p>Bush and the Republicans who increased spending after 2001 were anything but conservative! That is part of the problem. McCain is also far from conservative, but he is better than Barry. Thanks for reading and commenting. Next time leave your real name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ME</title>
		<link>http://www.edgeblog.net/2008/tax-cuts-do-not-cause-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-86403</link>
		<dc:creator>ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgeblog.net/?p=154#comment-86403</guid>
		<description>A few things:

1. Laffer was right when the top tax rate was 70%.  We&#039;re on the other side of the curve now.

2. Comparing current tax revenue under a lower rate, with old projections of tax revenue under the previous, higher rate, is not conclusive at all.  Not to mention the fact that there is no 1 projection, there are many, yet your graph shows one. hmmm.  You have no basis to compare revenues because you don&#039;t know what they would have been without the tax cut.  The &quot;Projections&quot; were never meant to be used the way you are misusing them.

3. &quot; far-left liberals in the Democrat party like Obama and the “moderate” Republicans like McCain have completely lost the concept of limited government.&quot;

Are you kidding me?  Is that some kind of joke?  Who the hell did you just call drunken sailors?  GWB and the republican controlled congress that passed NCLB and the medicare drug farce.  They weren&#039;t moderate, and they weren&#039;t liberal.

EVERYONE in washington has lost the concept of limited government.  Don&#039;t try to pretend the right wing is special or different in this regard.  The question at this point isn&#039;t whether the government is going to spend, but what they spend it on.  You want the government to throw cash at corporations, vote republican.  You want the government to throw cash at entitlements, vote democrat.

Small government is dead.  Get over it.  Move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few things:</p>
<p>1. Laffer was right when the top tax rate was 70%.  We&#8217;re on the other side of the curve now.</p>
<p>2. Comparing current tax revenue under a lower rate, with old projections of tax revenue under the previous, higher rate, is not conclusive at all.  Not to mention the fact that there is no 1 projection, there are many, yet your graph shows one. hmmm.  You have no basis to compare revenues because you don&#8217;t know what they would have been without the tax cut.  The &#8220;Projections&#8221; were never meant to be used the way you are misusing them.</p>
<p>3. &#8221; far-left liberals in the Democrat party like Obama and the “moderate” Republicans like McCain have completely lost the concept of limited government.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you kidding me?  Is that some kind of joke?  Who the hell did you just call drunken sailors?  GWB and the republican controlled congress that passed NCLB and the medicare drug farce.  They weren&#8217;t moderate, and they weren&#8217;t liberal.</p>
<p>EVERYONE in washington has lost the concept of limited government.  Don&#8217;t try to pretend the right wing is special or different in this regard.  The question at this point isn&#8217;t whether the government is going to spend, but what they spend it on.  You want the government to throw cash at corporations, vote republican.  You want the government to throw cash at entitlements, vote democrat.</p>
<p>Small government is dead.  Get over it.  Move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.355 seconds -->
